Regret-waste-escalation>blame or
fulfillment that is the question!
How come since antiquity most people, generations and cultures
fall for the same tricks and what are they?
|
The official OPTION I dogma
is based on ideas
generally democratically worth
spreading
in the market, i.e. based on
mass-attractivity as the
measure of all things. That p-principle
measure
promises the
possibility for g-generating
maximal welfare and that
converges in the visionary e-end
of the evolution in freedom for
anything that goes and that asks for everybody o-opening
up for more and more choice,
and that has lead to the present, pgeo-confusing Age
of Disruption! Now in
it, we are already deep in the ship of
virtuality with its own self-destructive dynamics
as outlined in Barry Schwartz's Ted Talk about "The
paradox of choice". |
In Schwartz's
estimation, choice has made us not freer but more
paralyzed, not happier but more dissatisfied. He
implies an optimal choice and
that for YOU, is between the
disrupting you, default OPTION I
and the fulfillment of your OPTION
II. The effort for both is the same,
struggling to please under OPTION I
in one of its traps avoiding what is considered
preceding %1-political
correctness, or to transcend that
temptation of your
8 dark evil inner
OPTION I
voices with your 16
OPTION II resources. However, the consequences
are eternally different:
disruptive, globally cancerous confusion versus
giving meaning to to self and others
towards Lifefulfilling Platforms. |
That is where NLP comes in, the
neuro-linguistic programming towards the level above the
pgeo-confusion
among the common people of this world,
in the MATRIX of the
pgoe-materialism
of the elite that is successful under
OPTION I with the p-principle
promise such as to make the coming year
the best by dissolving the e-end that have blocked you in
confusion so far. Then you are promised
to learn to condition yourself to g-generate
what o-opens you up to achieve your visions,
the desired self-image congruent to how others perceive you.
To make that approach lucrative its
mass-attractivity has been
raised pointing out its social Darwinian value, for who
come first profits first, and who comes too late is out; left with
the crumbs falling from the table of the elite from what they have
earned with peak-flow performance. Then comes the
invitation to learn to
model their successful systems with
NLP, so those who propagate that
approach become part of the successful ones
who determine which systems serve them well.
maintaining that TRAP, requires
pego-suppressing
any PRE-OPTION I systems, and
above all one's own TRANS-OPTION II soul and that of anybody
else. Only then can you successfully
peog-other-determine
others. This way dividing them from
their inner OPTION II system,
you can rule them with the proven successful systems of the
elite to
poge-dominating
your world too. Of course, when challenged, you are required to
poeg-demean
any competing system,
rhetorically outsmarting them, up to
using harder means. All organized in nation state, which have served
their purpose and are demeaned in our time in favor of the
zeitgeist enhanced by the internet of people and things,
internalized according to the NLP-5 monkey model.
So some people will fail; if it is too many of them,
almost all of them will fall back down the ladder, back into
pgeo-confusion -
human history and
destiny so far. In short, the result of modern psycho-logic-neuro-linguistic
politics is the globally wider opened Pandora-box; the
devil's circle that can only be overcome with
sufficient
oegp-OPTION
II fulfillment. This means being o-open for the e-end
as the consequences of g-generating with man-made p-principles
such as the
axioms of NLP:
1)
p-principles
to be kept to have a chance to become
mass-attractive
1.1 Respect other person's
models of the world (no need to
understand anything for there is
nothing respectable as such).
1.2 Behavior and change are to be
evaluated in terms of context, and the
ecology of chemical-physical and neuronal
processes (there is no substance
in its own right, it's all man-made
Cm-multiplied communication that converges to the
Bm-boundary conditions multiplied).
2)
g-end
of communication in virtuality are
opinions
2.1 Resistance in a client is a sign of lack of
rapport. (There are no resistant
clients, only inflexible communicators. Effective
communicators accept and utilize all communication presented
to them - it's all virtuality).
2.2 People are not their behaviors
(accept the communicating person;
change the behavior).
2.3 Everyone is doing the best they can
with the resources they have available. (Behavior is geared
for adaptation, and present
behavior is the best choice available;
every behavior is motivated by a positive
intention as part of forming
the next trend in the zeitgeist).
3)
e-end
of fulfilling any innate meaning - you,
your OPTION II
3.1 Calibrate on behavior: The
most important information about a person is that
person's behavior.
3.2 The map is not the
territory. (The words we use are
not the event or the item they represent.
You are in charge of your mind, and
therefore of your results - and I am also in charge of my mind
and therefore of my results - there is no
superior order to respect).
3.3 People have all the resources they need to succeed
and to achieve their desired
outcomes. (There are no unresourceful people, only
unresourceful states that can be changed with NLP).
3.4 All procedures should increase
wholeness (of OPTION I's
Cm-multiplied communication as the
prevailing, exclusive MATRIX).
4) o-open
for anything goes within the above
pge-MATRIX
4.1 There is only feedback! (There
is no failure and no fulfillment)
4.2 The meaning of communication
is the response you get (it's
all discussions, stupid!)
4.3 The Law of Requisite Variety: (The ideology of
the person/collective with the most
flexibility of behavior will
control the superior system by disrupting it to
maintain OPTION I, allowing its
self-destructive show to go on).
4.4 All procedures should be
designed to increase choice (the
requirement for freedom, in itself evoking disruption and social
Darwinism about pick up the dwindling crumbs).
You should not get sucked into the pgeo-confusion
by man-made dogmas, but rather analyze what they evoke
under OPTION I,
and accept the challenge that poses on the §1-L3 ethical scale to
your own 16 essential OPTION II resources...
|
pgoe-success elite
pgeo-people
|
Assuming
p-equality in the
experience of
g-brotherhood
in the OPTION I
practice, the successful elite clarifies the
o-opening of people's
e-end. Thus
framed |
people try to o-open
up with their OPTION II, which the
elite puts to the
e-end in
their system with a MATRIX which serves them. And that is
where the above NLP comes in with
attentive leadership
based on hating the OPTION II existence
in the name of o-e
justice, in science of objectivity, for it disturbs
OPTION I neuro-linguistic
programming, the intellect,
rhetoric,
politics, philosophy, spin-doctoring.
But here we call the
evolution hoax;
without a Creator nothing makes any sense, not even
the laws of nature, for they can be
misused. And the latter and its
species, can certainly not be explained in any meaningful way
with evolution. So here we transcend
the OPTION I evolution
myth which just does justice to the
history of
communication under OPTION I;
fulfilling itself with self-destruction in the
madness to be the bottom line of
science, like the above axioms. Overcoming this hoax begins with
realizing their is desirable O-orientation in recognizing
1) that each human system can
be understood with an oegp, i.e. has a
X-substance to not just be respected in its
appearance but to be
understood in its
life- through task-fulfillment towards synergy.
2)
Taking this oegp-attitude reveals that the
a-mode of being, besides the other 14 of a X-being is
actually the connection with the Creator
as insights/intuition revelation etc. in ones
conscience.
In order to M-manipulate anything to
go as the *3 pleases,
towards +2 lust, -4 away from
and effort for anything meaningful,
in the ?0-illusion of the blessing
of OPTION I science,
it
pre-trans-traps, thus a curse, what is above it by
-
EH-Coding it and
confining people to its
three taboo
of
- inhibiting the meaning
of OPTION II by
- out-casting
telling stories
about it,
- disrupt any effort to make it understandable with
metaphors, and
- denouncing taking responsibility for
insights as egoistic,
thus OPTION II as not socially compatible, not
%1-politically correct in refusing to sacrifice
ones OPTION II to the
%6-man-made Cm>Bm
zeitgeist's
selctions,
and the possibility for its
%5-manipulation/mutation...
The result of
M / O = STRESS < DEATH...
 |
00.11.05:
Our pgeo-formatted world is still 18 levels away from desirable
solutions...
|
 |
| 
